![]() ![]() Jeff Stelling breaks down in tears on his penultimate Soccer Saturday show, struggling to speak about a campaign about eating disorder deaths MAN CITY PICTURE SPECIAL: Erling Haaland shatters goal records and Arsenal had their dreams dashed - key moments from City's title charge MAN CITY ARE PREMIER LEAGUE CHAMPIONS! Taiwo Awoniyi's goal consigns Arsenal to a 1-0 defeat and ensures Forest's survival Mr Ashton is thereby able to play with immediate effect.' 'Therefore, the panel found the charge not proven. Graham added in a statement: 'Consequently, the panel concluded that there was not a high degree of danger and that the correct starting point under the Head Contact Process was a yellow card. The panel also considered what the degree of danger was in the tackle, concluding there was indirect contact to the head and that any force to the head or neck was low. 'Having seen and heard all the evidence, including that of Mr Murley, who gave a clear account as to the point of contact and the level of force involved in the tackle, the panel agreed with the submission that this was a yellow card offence.' Panel chair Gareth Graham said: 'Mr Ashton accepted committing an act of foul play that would have merited a yellow card. The winger was in danger of missing the final rounds after being sent off for a high tackleĪn independent disciplinary panel heard the appeal, which lasted five hours during which numerous angles of the tackle were shown, many having been not available to the referee and the match officials at the game.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |